Side effects are muscle pain and cognitive problems. There is no data that suggests it will prevent a heart attack or prolong life. it would be a terrible shame to have children taking a medication that most could have done without if only they ate less McDonald's and exercised more.
Parents are often influenced by doctors advice. If a child fits the criteria, drug companies advertise these drugs as life prolonging if not life saving, and a doctor advises so, parents will be likely to consent to the treatment. Until a child reaches their age of majority (18 in most states) they cannot make their own medical decisions. Since there is no long term studies that prove it will work, not what would happen to a person of statins for more than 50 years of their life, it would seen wreckless to force such a treatment on a child. Children do have informed consent, parents make healthcare decisions. Should we allow children who are not able to consent, be put on potentially dangerous medication that has no real multi year study to suggest it might actually work?

1 comment:
I agree children cannot consent. But when I think of how uninformed most parents are, how vulnerable they must feel before doctors, I wonder if even *parents* can really consent?...
Post a Comment